Pick Amazfit if
- Price is the binding constraint
- Long battery on a consumer watch matters
- 24/7 stress index without monthly fees
Amazfit reads 21/33 signals from a budget Zepp OS watch and ships 24/7 stress out of the box. Garmin reads 27/33 from a far broader athletic platform — Body Battery, training load, ECG, AFib screening, floors climbed — and uses manual GDPR upload until OAuth opens.
If price is the binding constraint and you want most of the daily-health signal stack today, Amazfit is the better budget pick on hardware, but it has no MyBodyAI integration yet, so nothing from it reaches the app; Garmin's data does, through the export upload. If Body Battery, training load, ECG with AFib screening, or floors climbed matter to you, Garmin is the more complete athletic watch even with the weekly GDPR ZIP upload until its OAuth flips on.
Per-category breakdown of health signals exposed by each vendor's developer API. The number is breadth, not quality.
| Signal | Amazfit | Garmin |
|---|---|---|
| Heart & Vitals | ||
| Resting HR | ✓ | ✓ |
| HRV | ✓ | ✓ |
| SpO2 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Respiratory Rate | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skin Temperature | ✓ | ✓ |
| Body Temperature | — | — |
| Blood Pressure | — | ✓ via Index BPM |
| ECG recording | — | ✓ |
| AFib detection | — | ✓ |
| Vascular age | — | — |
| Sleep | ||
| Sleep duration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sleep stages | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sleep score | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sleep efficiency | — | — |
| Sleep apnea index | — | — |
| Activity | ||
| Steps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Active minutes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calories | ✓ | ✓ |
| Activities | ✓ | ✓ |
| Floors climbed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Distance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fitness & Recovery | ||
| VO2max | ✓ | ✓ |
| Training load | ✓ | ✓ |
| Recovery / Readiness | ✓ | ✓ |
| Body Battery | — | ✓ |
| Stress (continuous) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cardiovascular age | — | — |
| Body Composition | ||
| Weight | — | ✓ via Index S2 |
| Body fat % | ✓ | ✓ via Index S2 |
| Muscle mass | ✓ | ✓ via Index S2 |
| Hydration | ✓ | ✓ via Index S2 |
| Bone mass | — | ✓ via Index S2 |
| Visceral fat | — | — |
Verified against vendor developer documentation and MyBodyAI backend code. This counts what a brand's API exposes, which is not the same question as what one device measures: the device catalog scores each model's own hardware, so its numbers differ.
Current Amazfit models Amazfit Active 3 Premium (2026), Amazfit Balance 3 (2026), Amazfit Balance Ultra (2026), Amazfit Bip Max (2026), all 17 Amazfit devices
Current Garmin models CIRQA Smart Band (2026), Forerunner 170 (2026), Forerunner 70 (2026), Forerunner 570 (47mm) (2025), all 28 Garmin devices
Pick Amazfit if
Pick Garmin if
Pick both if
For most people it is one or the other. Both are daily-wear devices that track the same core things, heart rate, sleep and activity, so wearing both is redundant. Use the matrix above to pick the one that wins the categories you care about.
Amazfit tracks 21 of the 33 signals I compare, Garmin tracks 27. The matrix above breaks it down by category, and they often win different categories.
Only if Garmin wins the categories you actually care about. If you already own Amazfit and it covers your main goal, the upgrade is rarely worth it. The matrix above shows exactly what changes.
From each brand's official spec sheets and support pages, cross-checked against independent hands-on reviews (DC Rainmaker, the5krunner, Tom's Guide). Signal-level edge cases are noted in the matrix, not hidden behind a single check mark.
Links to each vendor's store. None of them changed any pick above.
MyBodyAI is what I build with these signals — it pulls from any combination of the brands above and derives Biological Age and 12 health indices from the raw numbers. Free to try, no card. It's optional — the comparison above stands on its own.
Start your 7-day trial →